Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 104: 106368, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1155430

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 pandemic caused several alarming challenges for clinical trials. On-site source data verification (SDV) in the multicenter clinical trial became difficult due to travel ban and social distancing. For multicenter clinical trials, centralized data monitoring is an efficient and cost-effective method of data monitoring. Centralized data monitoring reduces the risk of COVID-19 infections and provides additional capabilities compared to on-site monitoring. The key steps for on-site monitoring include identifying key risk factors and thresholds for the risk factors, developing a monitoring plan, following up the risk factors, and providing a management plan to mitigate the risk. METHODS: For analysis purposes, we simulated data similar to our clinical trial data. We classified the data monitoring process into two groups, such as the Supervised analysis process, to follow each patient remotely by creating a dashboard and an Unsupervised analysis process to identify data discrepancy, data error, or data fraud. We conducted several risk-based statistical analysis techniques to avoid on-site source data verification to reduce time and cost, followed up with each patient remotely to maintain social distancing, and created a centralized data monitoring dashboard to ensure patient safety and maintain the data quality. CONCLUSION: Data monitoring in clinical trials is a mandatory process. A risk-based centralized data review process is cost-effective and helpful to ignore on-site data monitoring at the time of the pandemic. We summarized how different statistical methods could be implemented and explained in SAS to identify various data error or fabrication issues in multicenter clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Exactitud de los Datos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación/tendencias , Gestión de Riesgos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Gestión del Cambio , Comités de Monitoreo de Datos de Ensayos Clínicos/organización & administración , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/economía , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/organización & administración , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Gestión de Riesgos/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes
2.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 98: 106154, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-778571

RESUMEN

The first cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were reported in December 2019 and the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 was declared a pandemic in March 2020 by the World Health Organization. This sparked a plethora of investigations into diagnostics and vaccination for SARS-CoV-2, as well as treatments for COVID-19. Since COVID-19 is a severe disease associated with a high mortality, clinical trials in this disease should be monitored by a data monitoring committee (DMC), also known as data safety monitoring board (DSMB). DMCs in this indication face a number of challenges including fast recruitment requiring an unusually high frequency of safety reviews, more frequent use of complex designs and virtually no prior experience with the disease. In this paper, we provide a perspective on the work of DMCs for clinical trials of treatments for COVID-19. More specifically, we discuss organizational aspects of setting up and running DMCs for COVID-19 trials, in particular for trials with more complex designs such as platform trials or adaptive designs. Furthermore, statistical aspects of monitoring clinical trials of treatments for COVID-19 are considered. Some recommendations are made regarding the presentation of the data, stopping rules for safety monitoring and the use of external data. The proposed stopping boundaries are assessed in a simulation study motivated by clinical trials in COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Comités de Monitoreo de Datos de Ensayos Clínicos , Proyectos de Investigación/tendencias , Vacunación , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Comités de Monitoreo de Datos de Ensayos Clínicos/organización & administración , Comités de Monitoreo de Datos de Ensayos Clínicos/normas , Comités de Monitoreo de Datos de Ensayos Clínicos/tendencias , Simulación por Computador , Comités de Ética en Investigación , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/ética , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA